Most viewed | ranked
Most commented | Most popular
Published on 09/05/18
Viewed 413 times

Reverse image
Spathiphyllum 3
Spathiphyllum 4
Spathiphyllum without pot

Related photos

Another spathiphyllum

Author 'Raph.debecker' (Id 240713 ) : This image should, in principle, be enough to net
The first rejected for lack of sharpness

Another spathiphyllum
Another Spathiphyllum in 'Photo Spathiphyllum', Report error
Hidden datas
Group Album Send by mail Subscribe
<< Previous Photo<< Previous by Same Author Next by Same Author >> Next Photo >>
Fit for your screen resolution Wallpaper Iphone (320x480)
EXIF : Brand: Nikon | Camera: Nikon D70
Aperture: f/6.3 | Exposure time: 1/250 s | Focal: 98 mm (eq. 147 mm)| Metering: Multi-segment (5)
Prog. expo.: Non défini (0) | Correction: 0 EV | Flash: Non (0) | Date: 03/11/2010 13:12:25
3 Favorites : D.marsim, Gipsy34, Ninik like too...

Another spathiphyllum: 7 Comment(s) | Very Good (4.07/5)
Add a comment
I like *

* = Required field.



> Mady [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply May 15, 2018
Ah ! The photos rejected for lack of sharpness and those accepted in spite of the blur In any case, it is clear, the horizontal layout of the original, and the sharing of the background between dark and light diagonal gives a graphical look interesting The clear area of the background is me it seems a little noisy. We can remedy this in post-processing.
Why a format so small ?
> Ninik [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply May 12, 2018
Here the heart is very clear, and the flower well-presented on a background of black and gray diagonal. You can post a 'retouching' with the same picture in the vertical. There is nothing that prohibits the posting of photos in format 'portrait'.
> Jofu [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply May 10, 2018
Beautiful lighting ; the background has a characteristic geometric original .
 > Author Raph.debecker [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
May 11, 2018
Thank you Jofu but, do you see the first meaning was the image presented vertically of course incompatible with the format 'wallpaper'
However, the graphics of the background showed up better vertically for my taste.
Friendships photographic, Raphael.
> D.marsim [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply May 10, 2018
Well said Catherine. Ralph I find it original how you present this spathiphyllum clean and pleasantly lit.
 > Author Raph.debecker [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
May 11, 2018
Thank you Marsim but, do you see the first meaning was the image presented vertically of course incompatible with the format 'wallpaper'
However, the graphics of the background showed up better vertically for my taste...
Friendships photographic, Raphael.
> Jean-paul.guigo46 [G] [P] [C] >Reply May 09, 2018
The image is interesting, well net, although personally a bit of blur does not bother me, but good it is necessary to comply with the rule
 > Author Raph.debecker [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
May 10, 2018
Thank you Jean-paul for your kind appreciation about the blur... Because the blur is sometimes desired or necessary (such as the printing speed, for example).
> Perronnet Catherine [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply May 09, 2018
the sharpness is good, the presentation interesting and the lighting very flattering.
 > Author Raph.debecker [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
May 09, 2018
Hello or good evening Catherine, my impression is that my first shot was not as blur as catalogued by our friends the moderators, I must necessarily bow myself before their assessment
However, it also remains a blur for some shots accepted who clearly are just too fuzzy... too bad it's the rules decided by our specialists...
Friendly and thanks for your comments, Raphael.
 > Author Raph.debecker [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
May 09, 2018
Thank you Catherine to confirm the sharpness of the image, the previous one seemed to me a justification to be accepted in the same lighting conditions and focus... But, no (thankfully)
Perfect, because perfection leads to monotony...
 > Author Raph.debecker [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
May 09, 2018
Hello Catherine, in reality, the presentation of the shot had to be vertical, of course, because of the diagonal...
This all change the basic idea of the volumes and the layout of the page... Sorry ! Raphael.
 > Perronnet Catherine [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
May 10, 2018
We have all noticed long ago that a member regularly sends blurry photos and boring that are accepted : there has been forums on this, several people have noted the lack of sharpness or even the visibility of his photos, but this remains as well. So we took our party. Some have opened a forum to post the rejected pictures and very often they are much less blurred than those accepted from this member. It doesn't matter. That said only the webmaster decides whether or not to accept a photo. He probably decided to 'protect' this member for a reason known only to him. So, don't worry, and when a photo is rejected offers-in another. Good day.
Comment(s) : 7 | Average : Very Good (4.07/5)
> Add this photo to a group

Français - English - Español - Coloring Another spathiphyllum
Legal Disclaimer and Terms of Use
Back to top | Email Subscription | Contact | Site map | HD Wallpapers | Puzzle fleurs