Most viewed | ranked
Most commented | Most popular
Published on 24/04/10
Viewed 1703 times

Related photos

Dsc04105 3 Moon

Author 'Boucher Marc dit de Meilh' A voir (Id 114671 ) : The first quarter moon taken on 21 April 2010 at 10:30 p.m. at the Sigma 70-300mm APO DG Macro mounted on the Sony Alpha 500. I find it quite amazing the effect that all photography has not been altered except that a crop to give more importance to the image. Further trials are planned ... Marc Boucher said Meillan. : 19:

Dsc04105 3
Dsc04105 3 in 'Photo Moon', Report error
Hidden datas
Group Album Send by mail Subscribe
<< Previous Photo<< Previous by Same Author Next by Same Author >> Next Photo >>
Fit for your screen resolution Wallpaper Iphone (320x480)
EXIF : Brand: Sony | Camera: Sony A500 | Objectif: Sigma 70-300mm F/4-5.6 DG APO Macro
Aperture: f/5.6 | Exposure time: 1/500 s | ISO: 400 | Focal: 300 mm (eq. 450 mm)| Metering: Spot (3)
Prog. expo.: Priorité temps d'exposition (3) | Correction: -0.3 EV | Flash: Non (16) | Date: 21/04/2010 22:26:56
Rue Jean Macé, 38300 Bourgoin-Jallieu, France

Show map with near photos.

1 Favorites : Candy
Dsc04105 3: 8 Comment(s) | Very Good + (4.62/5) | 1 Avis de visiteur
Add a comment
I like *

* = Required field.



> Anaa [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply Oct 27, 2014
I have been photographing the sun but also the moon, and I have the same shots that I have, the first time given the thrill
I never thought I would be able to see the craters - it's great - I have a nikon HD 42x coolpix and it was very satisfied, but I never dared to present these photos - thank you for doing this - naal -.
 > Author Boucher Marc dit de Meilh [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
Oct 28, 2014
Hello Naal, thank you for this comment on this picture. I have a larger HD, it would certainly be of the best quality. It is not easy to photograph the stars, it should be a goal for this... I'm doing it with a Sigma or Tamron 70-300mm to see more than 450 mm, and this is still a fair bit. It should be a good 500 mm x 1. 5 = 750 mm, and the result would be more convincing. With the Nikon 510 42X normally in digital zoom you'll be up to 1000 mm, but in order to get a good result at these distances you need to work on a tripod. You should try to show your photos of the moon anyway ! Good day and more Marc.
> Dom. [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply May 02, 2010
3: I like your first quarter, net, whose colors and reliefs are the most beautiful effect. Thank you Marc. : 6:: 2:
 > Author Boucher Marc dit de Meilh [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
May 02, 2010
Thank you Dom. To say that and I'm happy of course to know that somewhere there likes me. Thank you again, but here too the moon its craters, its ravines, plains, dunes ... What nature. Regards, Mark. : 19:
> Giordan >Reply Apr 29, 2010
Hi Mark, I decided to 10/24 Tamron, Muller photo to 369 €, really reasonable! And also it is near my home in Toulon, less postage. As soon as I get it, I'll post pictures taken with. Good day.
 > Author Boucher Marc dit de Meilh [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
Apr 29, 2010
Hello Giordan happy with your choice. Here, you'll get us some excellent photographs. You'll have to do quite a test to familiarize yourself with one hand objo and secondly, the relationship between him and your SLR and tips that come with them and make the perfect picture ... Wish you a beautiful day on the beaches around Toulon ... Lucky! Regards, Mark. : 19:
> Giordan >Reply Apr 25, 2010
It's me again, Mark! And although I hesitate again! The 10/20 or 17/70, because it makes the macro, and not the other! But on the other hand, my 18/200 covers almost the focal, it also macro but not compared with 1 / 1. I ask myself a question: If the 10/20 Sigma, of course, I put on windscreens, what will that get us?? I think it will not work, you'll have to approach the subject too closely! Ouch! Not only good to talk! Come on, I expect your opinion Mark. Good evening. Regards. Giordan
 > Author Boucher Marc dit de Meilh [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
Apr 25, 2010
You have enough reason when you talk about bonnets. On a fixed lens, fixed-aperture it can work quite well. In the 10-20 GA I am puzzled as to the result. However, the wide angle 10-20 x 1. 6 = 16-32 mm Nikon tone is good for landscape photography (panoramic views) better than mine. Te advise Tamron 10-24 to € 399. Very good Sigma macro 50mm f / 2. € 8-300. Tamron macro 90mm f / 2. 8-405 € (two macros are excellent) You have two objos interesting macro. Features on Digit-Photo. Behold, then Julicarm Nenfer13 or information on FEI and also a photo shop with you. Do not throw yourself at the outset of the times for reflection. Feel free to ask me for information too. If I can help no problem Giordan. Regards, Mark.
> Giordan >Reply Apr 25, 2010
Hello marc, Sigma goals, we must admit are very good! I have a 18/200, I hesitated long before I give, sometimes very badly criticized or appreciated! So I watched a lot of pictures taken with it, and I noticed that the results were not disappointing. So I bought the Canon 50D, and I'm not disappointed. It must of course be careful in the settings. Now I equip myself thinking a wide angle, and take the Sigma 10/20. I actually have time to do many things! I'm in early retirement for 6 years! And I appreciate very much!
 > Author Boucher Marc dit de Meilh [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
Apr 25, 2010
Hello again Giordan. You're right of course about all that can be said about the goals of not opening between f / 1:1. 4 f / 1:2. 8. A matter of marketing and also the most inexperienced of time because of a priori prejudices expressed on these objectives skilled faint. There is experimentation and this is not done in a day or a few pictures taken in haste. The Sigma 18-200 has very good reviews, it has been tested many times and the results are excellent. It was expected according to what I know. So your choice is good. You need to know him well and especially NPC and test your work in Aperture Priority, priority transmission for making movements: water, shopping, etc.. In manual if you're forced to because of a lack of light, etc.. For wide angle you're entitled to super wide angle, it is a choice too. Me, I'm satisfied with Sigma 17-70 mm DC macro F / 1:2. 8, 4-5 is great, but not a
> Franes >Reply Apr 25, 2010
Very nice picture, one has the impression that you can almost touch it. Between dream and reality ...
 > Author Boucher Marc dit de Meilh [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
Apr 25, 2010
Franks thank you. It is indeed true, one has the impression of having at hand. I promise more pictures of her whenever possible. It is unbelievable these objectives will they look sometimes ... And frankly, I do not expect by looking at the moon in the viewfinder to have holes and bumps on it ... Deepest sympathy, Mark. : 19:
> Nenfer13 [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply Apr 25, 2010
A stunning image of realism, it is hard to believe she was made a focal length equivalent of 450mm. I am also surprised by the EXIF, f / 5. 6 - 1/500s - ISO 400 and a correction in exposure of 0. 3 ev? I can hardly believe it because if the time of the shooting is accurate, 10:26 p.m., it was pitch black. It should basically work on a tripod and with exposure times much longer for this type of photo: 14:.
 > Author Boucher Marc dit de Meilh [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
Apr 25, 2010
Hello Ferdinand. : 19: ... Yes, I understand your surprise and yet the reality is there! I actually took this photo at 10:26 p.m. on 21/04/10 (between two meals, running ...) at 400 ISO, 1 / 500 seconds, f / 5. 6 and 300mm, etc.. The TV has been developed with the 'brutality', quickly and efficiently in light moon ... I did not have a very clear sky and no longer black but ... No TRIPOD Ferdinand. On another picture: Lap expo 1/200sds, focal length f / 7. 1 and ISO 400 which is clearer, the sharpness is the same. (I can send it to you if you wish ?...) We do not always know everything about his equipment often "felt" rushed through us and sometimes the experts ... Me too, I'm quite surprised, astonished ... My family also was there, still can not believe ... mainly to the eye it had no details, but no details !!!... Sincerely and Friendship, Mark: 1:
> Giordan >Reply Apr 24, 2010
The photo is beautiful! Perfectly clear. Astronomy enthusiast, I love this shot. 3:
 > Author Boucher Marc dit de Meilh [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
Apr 25, 2010
Giordan Hello and happy Sunday. Thank you for your visit, to have made some verbal notes on this photo. Yes, I am quite surprised by my Sigma 70-300 mm. The moon was no visible to the naked eye could not see craters and then zooming in on the screen of the NPC to be pleasantly surprised, as carried on the planet moon ... Imagine for a moment? ... A miracle, a fairy tale! I saw that you were pretty much said so ... where did you get this energy? Bravo for your pictures and others, you gotta go ... I'll see your gallery from time to time. Regards, Mark.
> Tintin.dd [G] [P] [C] [B] [F] >Reply Apr 24, 2010
A very good clarity allowing us to distinguish between craters: 1:. 3:
 > Author Boucher Marc dit de Meilh [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
Apr 25, 2010
Tintin Yes, I do not expect that I assure you. Very surprised the marco to have this image that seemed all white with no relief in a sky thick darkness ... Thank you, Mark.
Comment(s) : 8 | Average : Very Good + (4.63/5)
> Add this photo to a group

Français - English - Español - Coloring Dsc
Legal Disclaimer and Terms of Use
Back to top | Email Subscription | Contact | Site map | Photos Bourgoin-Jallieu | HD Wallpapers | Battle de mots entre amis