Dsc04105 3 Moon

Hello Naal, thank you for this comment on this picture. I have a larger HD, it would certainly be of the best quality. It is not easy to photograph the stars, it should be a goal for this... I'm doing it with a Sigma or Tamron 70-300mm to see more than 450 mm, and this is still a fair bit. It should be a good 500 mm x 1. 5 = 750 mm, and the result would be more convincing. With the Nikon 510 42X normally in digital zoom you'll be up to 1000 mm, but in order to get a good result at these distances you need to work on a tripod. You should try to show your photos of the moon anyway ! Good day and more Marc.

Thank you Dom. To say that and I'm happy of course to know that somewhere there likes me. Thank you again, but here too the moon its craters, its ravines, plains, dunes ... What nature. Regards, Mark. : 19:

Hello Giordan happy with your choice. Here, you'll get us some excellent photographs. You'll have to do quite a test to familiarize yourself with one hand objo and secondly, the relationship between him and your SLR and tips that come with them and make the perfect picture ... Wish you a beautiful day on the beaches around Toulon ... Lucky! Regards, Mark. : 19:

You have enough reason when you talk about bonnets. On a fixed lens, fixed-aperture it can work quite well. In the 10-20 GA I am puzzled as to the result. However, the wide angle 10-20 x 1. 6 = 16-32 mm Nikon tone is good for landscape photography (panoramic views) better than mine. Te advise Tamron 10-24 to € 399. Very good Sigma macro 50mm f / 2. € 8-300. Tamron macro 90mm f / 2. 8-405 € (two macros are excellent) You have two objos interesting macro. Features on Digit-Photo. Behold, then Julicarm Nenfer13 or information on FEI and also a photo shop with you. Do not throw yourself at the outset of the times for reflection. Feel free to ask me for information too. If I can help no problem Giordan. Regards, Mark.

Hello again Giordan. You're right of course about all that can be said about the goals of not opening between f / 1:1. 4 f / 1:2. 8. A matter of marketing and also the most inexperienced of time because of a priori prejudices expressed on these objectives skilled faint. There is experimentation and this is not done in a day or a few pictures taken in haste. The Sigma 18-200 has very good reviews, it has been tested many times and the results are excellent. It was expected according to what I know. So your choice is good. You need to know him well and especially NPC and test your work in Aperture Priority, priority transmission for making movements: water, shopping, etc.. In manual if you're forced to because of a lack of light, etc.. For wide angle you're entitled to super wide angle, it is a choice too. Me, I'm satisfied with Sigma 17-70 mm DC macro F / 1:2. 8, 4-5 is great, but not a

Franks thank you. It is indeed true, one has the impression of having at hand. I promise more pictures of her whenever possible. It is unbelievable these objectives will they look sometimes ... And frankly, I do not expect by looking at the moon in the viewfinder to have holes and bumps on it ... Deepest sympathy, Mark. : 19:

Hello Ferdinand. : 19: ... Yes, I understand your surprise and yet the reality is there! I actually took this photo at 10:26 p.m. on 21/04/10 (between two meals, running ...) at 400 ISO, 1 / 500 seconds, f / 5. 6 and 300mm, etc.. The TV has been developed with the 'brutality', quickly and efficiently in light moon ... I did not have a very clear sky and no longer black but ... No TRIPOD Ferdinand. On another picture: Lap expo 1/200sds, focal length f / 7. 1 and ISO 400 which is clearer, the sharpness is the same. (I can send it to you if you wish ?...) We do not always know everything about his equipment often "felt" rushed through us and sometimes the experts ... Me too, I'm quite surprised, astonished ... My family also was there, still can not believe ... mainly to the eye it had no details, but no details !!!... Sincerely and Friendship, Mark: 1:

Giordan Hello and happy Sunday. Thank you for your visit, to have made some verbal notes on this photo. Yes, I am quite surprised by my Sigma 70-300 mm. The moon was no visible to the naked eye could not see craters and then zooming in on the screen of the NPC to be pleasantly surprised, as carried on the planet moon ... Imagine for a moment? ... A miracle, a fairy tale! I saw that you were pretty much said so ... where did you get this energy? Bravo for your pictures and others, you gotta go ... I'll see your gallery from time to time. Regards, Mark.

Tintin Yes, I do not expect that I assure you. Very surprised the marco to have this image that seemed all white with no relief in a sky thick darkness ... Thank you, Mark.