Most viewed | ranked
Most commented | Most popular
Published on 11/05/13
Viewed 453 times

Reverse image
Imgp4333 red black goat spec
Imgp4314 goose pond protecte
I had taken for a species of
Dalhia 046 species
Here is one of the nearly 1
Dunes protected
In protected area 03 10 08 0

Related photos
Related com

Species Protected Sign



Author 'Chasseur de temps' (Id 194268 ) : Photo taken in the Bay of the Somme region is very popular with hunters... images insured to meet in this place a very varied fauna.



Species Protected
Species Protected in 'Photo Sign', Report error
Hidden datas
POST ON PHPBB FORUM ADD ON HTML PAGE
Group Album Send by mail Subscribe
<< Previous Photo<< Previous by Same Author Next by Same Author >> Next Photo >>
Resolution : 1280x800 Fit for your screen resolution Wallpaper Iphone (320x480)
 
 
 
 
 
EXIF : Brand: Nikon | Camera: Nikon D70
Aperture: f/9.0 | Exposure time: 1/320 s | Focal: 55 mm (eq. 82 mm)| Metering: Multi-segment (5)
Prog. expo.: Non défini (0) | Correction: 0 EV | Flash: Non (0) | Date: 24/04/2013 10:28:06
3 Comment(s)
Add a comment
NickName 
 
 Link
Subscribe
                      
I like *



* = Required field.
Suggestions

                      

Reviews

> Lumixane [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply May 13, 2013
I understand that controversy is the word wildlife employee in your intro that refers both to the occupants of adults from the reserve and travellers in the area allocated to them. Knowing you a little, Yvon, I know that this is not to be taken in the 1st degree. For me a common denominator between these two panels, migration. To each his own interpretation, his own convictions. You took a risk in posting this photo !
 
 > Author Chasseur de temps [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
May 13, 2013
 
I discovered your comment at the point where I was about to meet Lou feignassou. So I'm going to attempt to dispel this fog that seems to have given my about a coloration that is not like me.
I would like to ask two questions.
Am I at the origin of the presence of these two signs on this pole ?
I talked about a moment of 'juxtaposition strange or bizarre' ?
Everyone is free to make his own play based on personal feelings, this does not forbids me not to repeat what I said to Charly 'my photo just to show, without artifice...'
As for the risk that you look back at Anne, he should not resist to a 'reasoned approach' but I was sensitive to your reaction and I thank you for that.
 
> Lou feignassou [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply May 13, 2013
the juxtaposition of signs can lead to associations of ideas and caroms cognitive quirky and funny, but then, I find that you fall flat : first of all, I agree with Charly, this rapprochement between the travelling people and wildlife is very borderline ; and, second, this juxtaposition has nothing strange or peculiar, because geographical proximity is explained, the commons strives to make these areas the further from the center, to the confines of the limits of the municipality, therefore, in areas not built or even non-buildable as wilderness areas and natural.
 
> Charly [G] [P] [C] [B] [F] >Reply May 12, 2013
It could be interpreted as a provocation to the people on the trip whose reputation is well-known (and not always justified).
Your photo could also be classified under the heading 'unusual'.
 
 > Author Chasseur de temps [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
May 13, 2013
 
I hear your comment Charly but my picture is happy, without the slightest artifice, to show what each of us can see and read in a place easy to find. All possible should they ban photographers to realize ?
 
> Add this photo to a group

Français - English - Español - Coloring Species Protected
Legal Disclaimer and Terms of Use
Back to top | Email Subscription | Contact | Site map | HD Wallpapers | Battle de mots entre amis