«
     
Most viewed | ranked
Most commented | Most popular
Published on 07/10/13
Viewed 1055 times

Reverse image
Cruiser colbert
Colbert 23 03 2005 4
PT cruiser
PT cruiser 01
Maulevrier Chateau Colbert
Colbert Ret Floral 12 06 200
PT cruiser courtouphle

Related photos
Related com
Nearby

The cruiser Colbert seen through the rigging of th



Author 'Gdix' : It was in 2003 in Bordeaux. The cruiser 'Colbert', gone today, is seen from the quay, through the shrouds of the Belem.



The cruiser Colbert seen through the rigging of th
The Cruiser Colbert Seen Through Th in 'Photo Military Vessel', Report error
Hidden datas
POST ON PHPBB FORUM ADD ON HTML PAGE
Group Album Send by mail Subscribe
<< Previous Photo<< Previous by Same Author Next by Same Author >> Next Photo >>
Resolution : 1024x768 Fit for your screen resolution Wallpaper Iphone (320x480)
 
 
 
 
 
EXIF : Brand: OLYMPUS OPTICAL CO.,LTD | Camera: Olympus C720UltraZoom
Aperture: f/7.1 | Exposure time: 1/1000 s | ISO: 400 | Focal: 40.5 mm | Metering: Multi-segment (5)
Prog. expo.: Priorité ouverture (2) | Correction: -0.3 EV | Flash: Non (0) | Date: 00/00/0000 00:00:00
Quai des Chartrons, Bordeaux, France

Show map with near photos.

1 Favorites : Labrume
The cruiser Colbert seen through the rigging of th: 5 Comment(s) | Very Good (4.3/5)
Add a comment
NickName 
 
 Link
Subscribe
                      
I like *



* = Required field.
Suggestions

                      

Reviews

> Author Gdix [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply Oct 13, 2013
You're right, Nicole. The presence of this crane is all the more regrettable that I would have taken 10 seconds to remove it without any trace. I have a tendency to look for the aestheticization of my subjects to the shooting, in accordance to their real state. I am in post-processing if necessary, but the least possible. Victim of my tendency, I did not think to weigh the advantage that I would have had by removing this crane (advantage, however).
In addition, knowing your affection for the mountains and mastery as you watch, I asked myself if there could be a relation with the fact that my photo of boats pleased you. It seems to me that the common point could be in the superposition of two planes of reality very different, with effects of integration rather problematic for that consciousness there is the thrill of interference interesting . Thank you for your comment, Nicole.
 
> Nicoledesplat [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply Oct 10, 2013
A chassé-croisé or jumble of rope that I appreciate very much with the focal point, the building of war, I was RAW in Saint Nazaire so the landscape remains the same crane, which spoils a bit the beautiful game of stringing
 
> Perronnet Catherine [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply Oct 08, 2013
You love the geometric lines apparently ! That is funny : I would have done the opposite : the foreground blur and the background net.
 
 > Author Gdix [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
Oct 09, 2013
 
Hello Catherine. Very glad of your remarks (though/not possible response/novel in three volumes). The geometric lines are casual. For me, the photo is to merge mentally with a site and photograph it by playing the best you can with all of the visual elements that it can offer... and on that day, there was the Belem and the Colbert in the landscape. I liked the mix of genres between these two monuments of the navy. Ideally, I would have wanted everything in the net, but I'm glad that the shrouds, ropes and sails of the Belem in the foreground, and have had the maximum sharpness (however, if Colbert had been completely blurred, which is not the case, my photo would have been missed because my frame puts it in a main subject). You, the people beloved of FEI, you are a little too much riding on the manichaeism of the blur, and the net. This concern riding do you removed, not the judgment of things more essential ? (not the place. Friendships, to +++).
 
 > Perronnet Catherine [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
Oct 10, 2013
 
There you're mistaken, I'm not blindly none of the rules sacrosanct as some seem to know by heart and apply without regard to any other criterion. I wasn't expressing my feeling all staff. On another comment you said you have visited my gallery and I have done this answer twice, but mystery of the art I have received my own response two times. Here it is : I refer you to this comment that came back to me : I had to make an error of manip. Thank you for the compliment, which to me goes right to the heart !!! It is certain that you will have quickly realized that the photo as such does not interest me : on the other hand, what she says yes.
 
> Labrume [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply Oct 08, 2013
I like a lot this kind of shot and I can add it with happiness in my favorites. Thank you.
 
 > Author Gdix [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
Oct 09, 2013
 
Congratulations on your advantageous position and without ambiguity to this picture. The climate is pasty the proper thinking would at our age, that we are conformed to an attitude of rejection careful or galvaudage in the face in an image with the mention of military activities. I think it takes a personality that is clear to make a positive judgment of pure photographic aesthetic this image as you did, without reservation, without bracket, without condition or justification. I am also very happy with this photo, for its construction as well as for the harmony of the palette. Thank you very much Labrume, for your message.
 
 > Labrume [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
Oct 09, 2013
 
I didn't tilté that it was a military ship, but anyway, it would not change my opinion on this photo. I like her and I will repeat it with pleasure.
 
Comment(s) : 5 | Average : Very Good (4.30/5)
> Add this photo to a group

Français - English - Español - Coloring The cruiser Colbert seen through the rigging of th
Legal Disclaimer and Terms of Use
Back to top | Email Subscription | Contact | Site map | HD Wallpapers | Battle de mots entre amis