Most viewed | ranked
Most commented | Most popular
Published on 15/04/12
Viewed 761 times

Reverse image
The jackdaw
The jackdaw

Related photos
Related com

Jackdaw return

Author 'Ainsiminilyse' (Id 174206 ) : Specially for Daniele (D); Marsim: 18:)! Maybe the jackdaw will please you - you it more under the blue sky of the evening of the same blue as its mirettes: 4:?
It is true that in my previous photo, my pair was behind enough nasty light to a wall: 12: but I had position because they were two!
Here on the high branches of 3 floors of my home near Sycamore: 19:

jackdaw return
Jackdaw Return in 'Photo Jackdaw', Report error
Hidden datas
Group Album Send by mail Subscribe
<< Previous Photo<< Previous by Same Author Next by Same Author >> Next Photo >>
Fit for your screen resolution Wallpaper Iphone (320x480)
EXIF : Brand: Nikon | Camera: Nikon Coolpix P90
Aperture: f/5.6 | Exposure time: 1/262 s | ISO: 64 | Focal: 97.8 mm (eq. 550 mm)| Metering: Multi-segment (5)
Prog. expo.: Priorité ouverture (2) | Correction: 0 EV | Flash: Non (16) | Date: 09/04/2012 17:22:00
7 Favorites : Manu, Julicarm, Gipsy34, Nicole.Barberon, Natureln, Lumixane, Tintin.dd like too...

Jackdaw return: 13 Comment(s) | Very Good (4.08/5)
Add a comment
I like *

* = Required field.



> Tintin.dd [G] [P] [C] [B] [F] >Reply Apr 17, 2012
In my walks at altitude, I meet less often the jackdaw, but benefit the call, then I take your beau cliche: 1:. Bravo Sylvie.
> Candy [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply Apr 17, 2012
: 4: Hello, I found this jackdaw really nice with a beautiful clear eye. For what is of cutting this or that, I think that each sees the photo that he submitted with his eye just after: 14:: 19:
> Lumixane [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply Apr 16, 2012
Woman by the Exchange below! I think I have understood your gait, cut to cut you as wisely take advantage of these branches for a photo of bird out beaten even though it is not entirely academic from a photographic point of view. It is good from time to time to leave free course is fantasy. Nothing does me gene here if not a small lack of definition of the fact you was a perpete: 18:
> Nicole.barberon [G] [P] [C] [B] [F] >Reply Apr 16, 2012
A very nice clear photo, this was the eye bright bird is well developed under the blue sky. : 3: Sylvie and thank you. : 1:
> Duluc [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply Apr 16, 2012
Blacks are super-bien controls and the decor showcases well the subject: 3:: 3:
> Ninik [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply Apr 16, 2012
+: Beautiful photo overall. The bird is well net and has eye bright. The blue sky background is well the jackdaw in value.

-:The subject is strong.
> Gontrand62 [G] [P] [C] [B] [F] >Reply Apr 16, 2012
I also photograph a couple but they were all on a very large tree, therefore the quality not terrible but I care anyway because by home you do not often see, this photo is superb: 3: bravo Sylvie.
 > Author Ainsiminilyse [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
Apr 16, 2012
: 4: Hello Gontrand!
Yes me also was top, top, Sycamore high! That is why I have crops!
Here Nice I see a few years ago and it is for this that they me interested and I surprised: they appear to all places adapt has and I see them often in edge of sea on the rocks.
Good day.
 > Gontrand62 [G] [P] [C] [B] [F] >Reply
Apr 16, 2012
Ho Beuvry are so high, high, high, the trees, the aircraft are forced to make a detour: 20: it is to say that I had trouble to do the photo: 18:
> Natureln [G] [P] [C] [F] (http://) >Reply Apr 15, 2012
Even if the branches are not a genial aesthetics, the bird is extremely beautiful and net! Me which have an article (attached link) on the difference between all these gentlemen-ladies in black dress, well I like put this photo. You me had also kindly sharing one of your photos for this article! Bravo Candy and thanks for sharing!
 > Author Ainsiminilyse [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
Apr 16, 2012
Hello burnt: 4:!
I finds at the moment your site hyper well done, clear and explicit: bravo a toi: 1:!
I put it in my favorites as I reference.
You should show a Charly because it seemed hesitate yesterday between the various species.
Thank you very much!
> Charly [G] [P] [C] [B] [F] >Reply Apr 15, 2012
+: I learn that the jackdaw live also in the city. I thought that was rather the mountain habitat and altitude. (I in I had seen in hiking in Chartreuse)
I also finds this black plumage with grayscale more or less dark. Finally it is also a beautiful bird.
Good colour rendering and precision on the eye! : 1:

-:The branches of the left might have be easily buffered and the right also but a little less easily.
 > Author Ainsiminilyse [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
Apr 15, 2012
: 4: Good evening Charly.
I think that the birds you have seen in Chartreuse should be of the chocards: 15:!
For the branches, watching the speech that I have has Isa: 19: Two against me: you are probably right but you do not explain to me why: 10:: 18:
 > Charly [G] [P] [C] [B] [F] >Reply
Apr 15, 2012
Thanks for the chocards. I look on wikipedia and indeed they live in mountain band as those I had seen (and as much I me plantais on their name: 12): for the explanation, I believe that Isa you repondu already. : 18:
> Isabelle S.B [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply Apr 15, 2012
+: Hello Sylvie: 4: you have the bowl... Me I have never seen of jackdaw: 12: Ta is successful, the colours of the plumage difficult being a return and the eye is net. : 3:

-:However, you would have had no difficulty a girl branches cut him and in the left corner (given the uniform sky): 18:: 18:
 > Author Ainsiminilyse [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
Apr 15, 2012
Rebonjour Isa and thank you for your passage!
To continue the debate in your post a little here, can you tell me why I should remove branches which you talk to me? I understand well that so ca do you like not really but I this photo, I thought, recoupee and just I have the choice to keep all these branches as if it were a musical scope which would put a note-bird : 5:!
And Yes, there is any ca in my head: 18:!
You will appreciate that we here are with 2 notice, perhaps valid both, according to subjective taste.
However, if there is a technical error, you would have of explain me it: 14: to be more constructive! The, tu me suggeres just a girl!
This long laius insist on the complexity of the interpretations... And promised, it is the last: 19:!
 > Isabelle S.B [G] [P] [C] [F] >Reply
Apr 15, 2012
Why remove them? In 1 because they are inesthetiques, but that should be the space to look. The it is bothersome that the branch is stack hair height of its beak and when I look at my eye bird is irresistiblement attracted by these branches. I'm less hard than Charly... Which gum as the right. Reason, but ca there seemed more difficult; would have had to reproduce a piece of tail: 18: Voila, voila... Good evening: 4:
Comment(s) : 13 | Average : Very Good (4.08/5)
> Add this photo to a group

Français - English - Español - Coloring Jackdaw return
Legal Disclaimer and Terms of Use
Back to top | Email Subscription | Contact | Site map | HD Wallpapers | Battle de mots entre amis