L arc Val has 73

Yes, this is what I told you... I talk to Nenfer13, by the way... I do and then nothing, I have pans that would take the length of a wall in an apartment... They are beautiful I assure you... So here Pavotbleu. Thank you. Marc.

Hello Ferdinand, I hope you are well ?... I am convinced of what you say, I discussed it with another belgian photographer, FEI... But if I download in a larger size, the photograph is rejected, I can't validate it... the format on EIF sent by me is : 2556X600 a dimension in addition to the above, it is impossible for me to make it validate. I think that it would be helpful, about FEI, we give the size of the formats on the panoramic... (especially now with the digital camera which are more endowed with these functions) otherwise, there will always be a frustration at this level and subject... this is what I can tell you my dear Ferdinand. I wish you a beautiful day and good health. Marc. the
Response from the Moderator: See the link below.

Hello Marc, I understand and I am fully agree with you. It should be that FEI will accept larger sizes for the panoramic otherwise what's good. Of course it will not be possible to have the sizes huge, but the 1920x1080 which is the format HD monitors current is accepted, why would it not be possible that the pan be 1920 pixels wide which would be even more significant. Would perhaps make the proposal to the web. More Ferdinand.

Hello Ferdinand. Yes, it would be interesting to resize the pictures as you say or to the limit : 1680 in width... but for me 1680 is : 7515X1680, my slr is more of 16Mpls... Then the shadow-pan is exactly at a minimum : 8192X1856 350, 00 resolution. The dslr A-580 is very good. As they are more sophisticated they need to manage their capacity... if not it goes. They are, in principle, with more details in the pictures, but this is relative... however, until then, the A-700 is very well seen in the race and remains a slr pro quality is very good. (according to the critics, French and foreign, etc.) For application to the WEB is certainly a guy of great openness of spirit, of value... , I think that you, the veterans of FEI, would have to say a word about it. Thank you my dear Ferdinand, and I wish you that happiness. Marc.

By clicking on the word pan, you stumbled on a forum topic that explains the procedure to follow.
Basically, you just have to add black stripes or white around your pan on top of the tv.

After that it should understand that the pages FEI appear to be visible to the largest number i.e. 1024 pixels wide.
Your panoramic that are 1920 pixels in length will always be displayed in a reduced size. You will need to click on the picture to see it in actual size.

Hello My Dear Webmaster. I would like to vs to thank for this answer regarding the 'Panoramic '. In fact is there, the difficulty about this type of photography that is resizing. I understand what vs tell, but a pano of the 1920's will also do a little more than 430 width... Is this the ideal ? To make stripes like on the tv to readjust to not worry but I don't know if this will change for the 'visibility' of photography and especially of the details. It is a question of the details in the panoramic photographer and vs even understand very well what I emit. I've seen on the forum, but there is too much contradiction between authors and in the end we don't understand a thing. I think that it would be helpful to decide once and for all on a given dimension in order to obtain a dimension that goes, after all, internet users have an HD screen and good size. Too bad for the others devoid of - of 17 inches. I vs sends a test. Friendship. Marc